Justices turn aside another challenge over Obama's citizenship

Obviously the SCOTUS has no stomach for challenging the President and the majority of the 2008 voters. If they refuse to take any of the challenges, the truth may never be known.

The reporter makes the statement "Obama and his staff produced copies of his birth certificate when he was running for president in 2008, and have previously dismissed questions over his citizenship." There seems to be a difference of opinion as to whether a Certificate of Live Birth is a valid substitute for a Birth Certificate.

If you go to FactCheck.org, you will see some discussion of the problems with the Certificate. You will also see a birth announcement published in the Honolulu Advertiser on Sunday, Aug. 13, 1961: 

I guess my problem is still the amount of money Obama has spent to hide his records from public view.  Where there is smoke, there usually is fire.

Excerpt: The Supreme Court has again cast aside an appeal that raised doubts about President Barack Obama's U.S. citizenship, a grass-roots legal issue that has gained little legal or political footing, but continues to persist in the courts.

The justices without comment Monday rejected a challenge from Charles Kerchner Jr., a Pennsylvania man who sought a trial in federal court forcing the president to produce documents regarding his birth and citizenship.

Kerchner's attorney, Mario Apuzzo, had argued in a petition with the Supreme Court that Obama did not fit the definition of a "natural-born citizen" required for the nation's highest office, as defined by Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution.

That clause states, "No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."

Read full CNN article here.