How Mitt Romney Mentally Castrated The Obama Campaign

The full report is an interesting read, going into the inter-workings of the Obama campaign.

Excerpt:  WHI:  All that internal polling – the swing states.  What I was just telling you about…there was one in particular that came out very strong for Romney.  Huge numbers.  Had to have shocked the Romney team a bit – maybe an outlier.  A glitch.  We are talking

in the neighborhood of a ten point walk over Obama.  Ten points in a so-called swing state?  Independents were like 60-40 favoring Romney.  Women came out just ahead for Romney.   Hispanics split almost 50-50.  And even the Blacks polled were just under 80 for Obama – which we have not seen in any poll since 2007.  Ever.

So this kind of data comes into the campaign, right?  They give it a look-over…decide it has to be….somethin’ off.  A mistake in the poll.  Those numbers are just too favorable to Romney.  He’s doing well but these internals are saying he is OWNING Obama in this state – a state that went for Obama back in ’08.  Now normally you take that kind of poll with a big grain a salt…and you…you move on.  Come back to it later.  Got sh-t to do, right?

Not these Romney boys.  They order up a new poll.  Like…it’s within 48 hours.  Do it again they say.  Do it right.  Increase the group.  Poll more voters.  Cross check the data and cross check it again.  Be god-amn thorough this time.

Now that costs money – but that’s the kind of money…that’s how they are doin’ their spending.  Smart.  Focused.  No waste.  They want facts.  They want real results….like a business…like a well run business.  That has been the Romney campaign so far.  When mistakes are made they quickly react…they refocus…they move on.  Just like a business.

UM:  The second poll – so they ran another poll? From a larger sample group?

WHI:  Right – exactly.  Spent a bit more money – they want to know EXACTLY where they are in this state.  If they take this state early on Election Night – that could be it for Obama.  One and done.  It’s a swing state you see…but Romney ain’t supposed to win it.  So yeah – they order up a second poll.  Get the group to do it fast – that takes more money.  But they spend it – willing to spend it to be certain of getting real information.  That’s how it’s done – I respect that.  Love a team that works like that.  Let me know where we are at – where we really sit with these people…then let me take it from there.  Get the f-ck outta my way and let me take it from there.

UM:  And what did that second poll show?

WHI:  (Both hands slap down onto their knees and WHI leans well forward in their seat.  Their eyes widened and that BIG smile broke out across their face again)

…Pure gold man.  That second poll…sh-t…it came out even better for Romney.  It bumped him another two points overall…picked up among women…more Independents…even a percentage among Democrats as a whole.  And that poll was done right – it was the real deal.  We ain’t talking some CNN/ABC/CBS/NBC/Gallup  bullsh-t here.  It was boots on the ground, diggin’ in the dirt…the real deal data that is the lifeblood of a campaign.  And it came back aces for Mitt Romney.  In a state he ain’t supposed to be winning!

Read full Ulsterman report here.

If this doesn't get your blood boiling, not much will.

Again, stupid Republicans falling into the traps set by the most liberal Democrats in the Senate.  Giving Obama this additional power, in addition to what he has already confiscated from Congress, would be pure suicide for the country.  Tea Party rise up.  We must get rid of not only the Democrats, but also the RINOs, if we are to survive as a free nation.

Excerpt:  The House of Representatives is set to consider legislation Tuesday that would exempt certain presidential appointees from having to be confirmed by the Senate.

But a number of conservative groups are arguing that the “Presidential Efficiency and Streamlining Act” amounts to Congress neutering itself and giving the executive branch unprecedented power.

Presidential appointees that would no longer require Senate confirmation under the legislation include the treasurer of the United States and the deputy administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration.

“The United States Constitution does not bestow kingly powers on the President to appoint the senior officers of the government with no process,” wrote Thomas McClusky, the senior vice president for the Family Research Council’s legislative arm, in a Monday memo to lawmakers.

Sources told The Daily Caller that there is concern in the ranks among conservatives opposed to the legislation that House leaders will bring the legislation up for a voice vote to avoid putting members on the record.

The legislation, sponsored by New York Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer, passed the Senate in June 2011, with 20 Republicans voting against it. The Senate bill has 17 co-sponsors, including both Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Republican Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.

McClusky of FRC Action estimated in his memo that “thousands of positions would be filled by the President without any Senate vetting.”

The legislation would affect appointments across the executive branch, including to the Defense, Homeland Security and Justice departments.

Referencing the Obama administration, McClusky wrote that, “In an administration that’s already circumvented Congress with dozens of controversial ‘czars’ this would mean even less accountability for the White House.”

In an April 2011 blog post, David S. Addington, a senior vice president and deputy chief operating officer of The Heritage Foundation, cited the “slow and detailed background investigations and mounds of duplicative paperwork.” He wrote that the bill sponsors have “identified a valid problem, but proposed the wrong solution.”

“The proper solution to the problem of a slow Senate is to speed up the Senate rather than to diminish the role of the Senate,” he wrote. “The Senate should look inward and streamline its internal procedures for considering all nominations.”

Read full Daily Caller article here.

Fmr. NAACP Chief C.L. Bryant Blasts Obama At Conservative Conference

Top ten poorest cities - all controlled by Democrats

Whens - Obama's socialist agenda

Received this email today.

Looking back thru the past 4 years, many "Whens" pop up. Read them all to better understand where we are going as a country.

WHEN - he refused to disclose who donated money to his election campaign, as other candidates had done, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- he received endorsements from people like Louis Farrakhan, Muramar Kaddafi and Hugo Chavez, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- it was pointed out that he was a total newcomer and had absolutely no experience at anything except community organizing, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- he chose friends and acquaintances such as Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn who were revolutionary radicals, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- his voting record in the Illinois Senate and in the U.S. Senate came into question, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- he refused to wear a flag lapel pin and did so only after a public outcry, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- people started treating him as a Messiah and children in schools were taught to sing his praises, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- he stood with his hands over his groin area for the playing of the National Anthem and Pledge of Allegiance, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- he surrounded himself in the White House with advisors who were pro-gun control, pro-abortion, pro-homosexual marriage and wanting to curtail freedom of speech to silence the opposition, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- he said he favors sex education in kindergarten, including homosexual indoctrination, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- his personal background was either scrubbed or hidden and nothing could be found about him, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- the place of his birth was called into question, and he refused to produce a birth certificate, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- he had an association in Chicago with Tony Rezco - a man of questionable character and who is now in prison and had helped Obama to a sweet deal on the purchase of his home - people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- it became known that George Soros, a multi-billionaire Marxist, spent a ton of money to get him elected, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- he started appointing White House Czars that were radicals, revolutionaries, and even avowed Marxist /Communists, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- he stood before the Nation and told us that his intentions were to "fundamentally transform this Nation" into something else, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- it became known that he had trained ACORN workers in Chicago and served as an attorney for ACORN, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- he appointed cabinet members and several advisers who were tax cheats and socialists, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- he appointed a Science Czar, John Holdren, who believes in forced abortions, mass sterilizations and seizing babies from teen mothers, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- he appointed Cass Sunstein as Regulatory Czar who believes in "Explicit Consent," harvesting human organs without family consent and allowing animals to be represented in court, while banning all hunting, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- he appointed Kevin Jennings, a homosexual and organizer of a group called Gay, Lesbian, Straight, Education Network as Safe School Czar and it became known that he had a history of bad advice to teenagers, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- he appointed Mark Lloyd as Diversity Czar who believes in curtailing free speech, taking from one and giving to another to spread the wealth, who supports Hugo Chavez, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- Valerie Jarrett, an avowed Socialist, was selected as Obama's Senior White House Advisor, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- Anita Dunn, White House Communications Director, said Mao Tse Tung was her favorite philosopher and the person she turned to most for inspiration, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- he appointed Carol Browner, a well known socialist as Global Warming Czar working on Cap and Trade as the nation's largest tax, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- he appointed Van Jones, an ex-con and avowed Communist as Green Energy Czar, who since had to resign when this was made known, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- Tom Daschle, Obama's pick for Health and Human Services Secretary could not be confirmed because he was a tax cheat, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- as President of the United States , he bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- he traveled around the world criticizing America and never once talking of her greatness, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- his actions concerning the Middle East seemed to support the Palestinians over Israel, our long time ally, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- he took American tax dollars to resettle thousands of Palestinians from Gaza to the United States, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- he upset the Europeans by removing plans for a missile defense system against the Russians, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- he played politics in Afghanistan by not sending troops early-on when the Field Commanders said they were necessary to win, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- he started spending us into a debt that was so big we could not pay it off, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- he took a huge spending bill under the guise of stimulus and used it to pay off organizations, unions, and individuals that got him elected, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- he took over insurance companies, car companies, banks, etc., people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- he took away student loans from the banks and put it through the government, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- he designed plans to take over the health care system and put it under government control, people said it didn't matter.

div>WHEN- he claimed he was a Christian during the election and tapes were later made public that showed Obama speaking to a Muslim group and 'stating' that he was raised a Muslim, was educated as a Muslim, and is still a Muslim, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- he set into motion a plan to take over the control of all energy in the United States through Cap and Trade, people said it didn't matter.

WHEN- he finally completed his transformation of America into a Socialist State, people woke up--- but it was too late. Add these up one by one and you get a phenomenal score that points to the fact that Barrack Hussein Obama is determined to turn America into a Marxist-Socialist society.

All of the items in the preceding paragraphs have been put into place. All can be documented very easily. Before you disavow this do an Internet search. The last paragraph alone is not yet cast in stone. You and I will write that paragraph. Will it read as above or will it be a more happy ending for most of America?

Don't just belittle the opposition. Search for the truth. We all need to pull together or watch the demise of a free democratic society. Pray for Americans to seek the truth and take action for it will keep us FREE. Our biggest enemy is not China, Russia, North Korea or Iran. Our biggest enemy is a contingent of politicians in Washington, DC. The government will not help, so we need to do it ourselves.

Question....will you delete this, or pass it on to others who don't know about Obama's actions and plans for the USA, so that they may know how to vote in November, 2012 and the ensuing years?

It's your decision. I believe it does matter. How about you?

WHEN- November 2012 comes, it will matter who you vote for!

Test of Fire: Evangelical Version

White House unnerved and unprepared for sequestration - Refused to pass budget

Because the Democrat led Senate refused to pass, or even consider a House Republican budget, the government was facing a shutdown last August as it reached its legal borrowing limit. In a compromise, Republicans agreed to an increase in the debt limit, but required certainty in spending reductions. Thus the sequestration plan was enacted. It was meant to be a stopgap measure to give Congress time to forge a proper spending reduction bill. Since last August, it has become apparent that the Democrats want only to maintain or increase spending and increase taxes on the American taxpayer. Bill after bill has been passed by the Republican led House and sent to the Senate. Democrat Harry Reid has completely shut off debate on any of these bills and seems to be very happy to blame Republicans for any inaction.

Excerpt: Tens of thousands of civilian employees in the Defense Department could receive warnings about potential layoffs four days before the November election if impending spending cuts aren't averted, hitting presidential battleground states such as Virginia and Florida hard.

The alerts would come in addition to any that major defense contractors might send out at the same time to their workers under an often-overlooked law, a prospect that is unnerving the White House roughly three months before voters go to the polls.

grapples with the looming, $1.2 trillion automatic reductions in defense and domestic programs.

"I don't think anybody has been able to come to grips yet with the severity of what sequestration means," Vollrath told the House Armed Services subcommittee on readiness.

Rep. J. Randy Forbes, R-Va., the panel's chairman, reminded Vollrath that the cuts were part of the law that Republicans and Democrats voted for last August and President Barack Obama signed.

Read full article here.

TOP 10 MOST DANGEROUS LIBERALS

It is good to know who your enemies are.  No surprises here.

Article:We have seen what rampant liberalism can do after these three-and-a-half years of misery. The left pushes an agenda that punishes success in order to spread the wealth around. It is important to know how some on the left operates:

1. President Obama

Give the former community organizer a second term in office and see the havoc that will follow. Unrestrained by political concerns, expect every possible left-wing policy to be enacted by executive order or through agency regulations. He already has taken us half-way to bureaucratic Gomorrah with his Obamacare travesty. The president has fulfilled his promise to transform America by making us more dependent on government.

2. George Soros

Most of the liberal infrastructure has been funded by financier George Soros. He has helped keep afloat such left-wing mainstays as Media Matters, Center for American Progress and Moveon.org., and donated heavily to the National Council of La Raza and Planned Parenthood. Funny how you don’t hear the left complain about the political influence of deep-pocketed donors when it comes to the billionaire sugar daddy for progressives.

3. Mainstream media

Led by the New York Times and the Washington Post, the mainstream media—which forgot to vet the presidential candidacy of Barack Obama in 2008—are making sure that no stone is left unturned when it comes to Mitt Romney. From Romney’s high school antics to his wife’s equestrian hobby, the supposedly objective media are trying to make scandals out of triviality while shedding no lights on a failed administration.

4. Harry Reid

The Senate majority leader is dangerous because he is virtually inert. The upper chamber passes nothing of consequence while sitting on bills passed by the House. Under his leadership, the Senate has not produced a budget in years—disregarding a statutory duty. Reid’s inaction fits right into Obama’s strategy of attacking a “do-nothing Congress.”

5. Eric Holder

Under siege in the Fast and Furious scandal, the attorney general has dropped all pretenses and is brazenly using the DoJ to pursue a political agenda. The department filed suit against Arizona’s immigration law and Texas’ voter ID law and Holder continually plays the race card to excuse his power grabs. As the contempt of Congress charge plays out, expect Holder to play hardball and lash out at critics.

6. Hollywood stars

With George Clooney and Sarah Jessica Parker hosting Obama fundraisers, Hollywood is mobilizing to get Obama reelected. Michael Moore, Barbra Streisand, Alec Baldwin and others love to lecture the rest of us about global warming and the evils of Wall Street. How about boycotting a movie with a known progressive as the star?

7. Lisa Jackson

The Environmental Protection Agency, under the direction of Lisa Jackson, is moving to control aspects of daily life in ways never imagined when the agency was formed. From enacting rules to combat global warming to regulating workplace dust, the EPA is pushing an agenda that couldn’t get through Congress even when Democrats controlled it.

8. Big Labor

With pro-union Hilda Solis heading the Labor Department and the National Labor Relations Board stacked in its favor, President Obama has returned the favor for the support Big Labor supplied for his election. He will need the unions even more in order to return for a second term. With the rest of his base lagging in enthusiasm, it will take the dedication of paid-union goons to get out the vote.

9. Janet Napolitano

For all the yapping from progressives about President George W. Bush’s disregard for the Constitution and the evils of the PATRIOT Act, there is little being said about the vast expansion of the Department of Homeland Security under Secretary Janet Napolitano. From groping Transportation Safety Administration workers to drones monitoring America, the massive agency is increasingly eroding our freedoms while trying to protect them.

10. Nancy Pelosi

It will take years, if not decades, to undo the damage done by the spending spree during Pelosi’s tenure as speaker of the House. From 2006 to 2010, the nation racked up trillions of dollars in debt, largely due to spending bills initiated by Pelosi’s Democratic House majority. And without her strong-armed tactics, Obamacare never would have become law. Let us make sure in November that there is not a second act for a Speaker Pelosi.


 Read original article here.

Michael - Why I'm changing my vote (video)

100 Million Poor People In America And 39 Other Facts About Poverty That Will Blow Your Mind

Reading this says that our children are in deep do-do.

Excerpt from InfoWars:  Don’t look down on the poor. You might be joining them a lot sooner than you might think.

The following are 40 facts about poverty in America that will blow your mind….

#1 In the United States today, somewhere around 100 million Americans are considered to be either “poor” or “near poor”.

#2 It is being projected that when the final numbers come out later this year that the U.S. poverty rate will be the highest that it has been in almost 50 years.

#3 Approximately 57 percent of all children in the United States are living in homes that are either considered to be either “low income” or impoverished.

#4 Today, one out of every four workers in the United States brings home wages that are at or below the poverty level.
#5 According to the Wall Street Journal, 49.1 percent of all Americans live in a home where at least one person receives financial benefits from the government. Back in 1983, that number was below 30 percent.

#6 It is projected that about half of all American adults will spend at least some time living below the poverty line before they turn 65.

#7 Today, there are approximately 20.2 million Americans that spend more than half of their incomes on housing. That represents a 46 percent increase from 2001.

#8 During 2010, 2.6 million more Americans fell into poverty. That was the largest increase that we have seen since the U.S. government began keeping statistics on this back in 1959.

#9 According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the percentage of “very poor” rose in 300 out of the 360 largest metropolitan areas during 2010.

#10 Since Barack Obama became president, the number of Americans living in poverty has risen by 6 million and the number of Americans on food stamps has risen by 14 million.

#11 Right now, one out of every seven Americans is on food stamps and one out of every four American children is on food stamps.

#12 It is projected that half of all American children will be on food stamps at least once before they turn 18 years of age.

#13 The poverty rate for children living in the United States is 22 percent, although when the new numbers are released in the fall that number is expected to go even higher.

#14 One university study estimates that child poverty costs the U.S. economy 500 billion dollars a year.

#15 Households that are led by a single mother have a 31.6% poverty rate.

#16 In 2010, 42 percent of all single mothers in the United States were on food stamps.

#17 According to the National Center for Children in Poverty, 36.4 percent of all children that live in Philadelphia are living in poverty, 40.1 percent of all children that live in Atlanta are living in poverty, 52.6 percent of all children that live in Cleveland are living in poverty and 53.6 percent of all children that live in Detroit are living in poverty.

#18 Since 2007, the number of children living in poverty in the state of California has increased by 30 percent.

#19 Child homelessness in the United States has risen by 33 percent since 2007.

#20 There are 314 counties in the United States where at least 30% of the children are facing food insecurity.

#21 More than 20 million U.S. children rely on school meal programs to keep from going hungry.

#22 A higher percentage of Americans is living in extreme poverty (6.7 percent) than has ever been measured before.

#23 If you can believe it, 37 percent of all U.S. households that are led by someone under the age of 35 have a net worth of zero or less than zero.

#24 A lot of younger Americans have found that they cannot make it on their own in this economy. Today, approximately25 million American adults are living with their parents.

#25 Today, one out of every six elderly Americans lives below the federal poverty line.

#26 Amazingly, the wealthiest 1 percent of all Americans own more wealth than the bottom 95 percent combined.

#27 The six heirs of Wal-Mart founder Sam Walton have a net worth that is roughly equal to the bottom 30 percent of all Americans combined.

#28 At this point, the poorest 50% of all Americans now control just 2.5% of all of the wealth in this country.

#29 Back in 1980, less than 30% of all jobs in the United States were low income jobs. Today, more than 40% of all jobs in the United States are low income jobs.

#30 Right now, the United States actually has a higher percentage of workers doing low wage work than any other major industrialized nation does.

#31 Half of all American workers earn $505 or less per week.

#32 In 1970, 65 percent of all Americans lived in “middle class neighborhoods”. By 2007, only 44 percent of all Americans lived in “middle class neighborhoods”.

#33 Federal housing assistance outlays increased by a whopping 42 percent between 2006 and 2010.

#34 Approximately 50 million Americans do not have any health insurance at all right now.

#35 Back in 1965, only one out of every 50 Americans was on Medicaid. Today, approximately one out of every 6Americans is on Medicaid.

#36 It is being projected that Obamacare will add 16 million more Americans to the Medicaid rolls.

#37 Back in 1990, the federal government accounted for 32 percent of all health care spending in America. Today, that figure is up to 45 percent and it is projected to surpass 50 percent very shortly.

#38 Overall, the amount of money that the federal government gives directly to the American people has risen by 32 percent since Barack Obama entered the White House.

#39 It was recently reported that 1.5 million American families live on less than two dollars a day (before counting government benefits).

#40 The unemployment rate in the U.S. has been above 8 percent for 40 months in a row, and 42 percent of all unemployed Americans have been out of work for at least half a year.

Recently, I wrote a long article about why there will never be enough jobs in the United States ever again.

That means that a whole lot of Americans are not going to be able to take care of themselves.

As our economy gets even worse, there is going to be a tremendous need for more love, compassion and generosity all over the country.

Don’t be afraid to lend a helping hand, because someday you may need one yourself.


Read full InfoWars article here.

Obama’s logic: a system that ‘allows’ us to thrive can disallow success

What we have in the White House is a person that has no clue about American exceptionalism. He was raised by Communists and Muslims and never engaged in the free enterprise system. Don't blame him; blame his upbringing. A major problem here in the U.S. is that we have allowed people, that believe in government as the source of everything good, settle into those very areas they believe should be the controllers of society. That is why there are so many socialist/communist leaning teachers, professors and government officials. Those that believe in capitalism and free enterprise shy away from those very jobs in favor of the productive side of our economy.


Unfortunately, for President, we elected a community organizer, one of the most unproductive and useless careers any free market American could imagine. He could be right, the government is allowing our entrepreneurs to succeed. As Obama's father has said, the government has the power to tax us 100%. 


Excerpt of Daily Caller article: Now we know what President Barack Obama really believes. And with this knowledge we have the rationale for his desire to use the force of government — a force always backed up by prisons and guns held by men with badges — to take from some and give to others: 


“If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen.” 


So said the president during a recent speech in Roanoke, Virginia.


Did you catch that word “allowed”? The system does not enable people to thrive. No, it allows us to thrive, as if it’s indulging us.


Our constitutional-scholar president apparently fails to understand or even wonder where government derives its ability to shower its supposed blessings. The answer: It derives this ability by first taking from people who work and businesses that succeed. 


Obama apparently fails to understand or even wonder about success. Millions of students have gone through the same K-12 school system as Steve Jobs. Millions of others have gone through the same secondary school system. Jobs was a college dropout. So Jobs received less from the system than millions of others. Yet how many Americans have accomplished what Steve Jobs accomplished?


 Obama offers no coherent answer for how some people accomplish so much more than others when we are government and government is us.


But he does have an answer for what to do about uneven outcomes. Denigrate accomplishment. And punish it. 

Read full Daily Caller article here.

We need Mitt Romney

New Chick-fil-A song by Tim Hawkins

Top Immigration Officials Describe Border Chaos Resulting From Obama's Amnesty Policy

Obama's top ten successful businesses

False Flag Survivalists

Ran across this article which is kind of far out regarding "government conspiracies", but it does have some good info if you are one that believes in keeping survival kits and storing food in cases of natural or man made catastrophes. Read full article here.

Right to work advantage over unionism

Geithner conceals $Billions paid to Goldman Sachs

United States Budget Dilemma

Religion under attack

DEMOCRATS' IDEAL VOTER: ILLEGAL ALIEN, SINGLE MOTHER, CONVICTED FELON

This is the topic of an email being circulated under the title "Ann Coulter has guts", that she does and she has attacked the problem head on. To restore our country to its rightful place, we must restore its racial balance, bringing in those that have the skills needed, regardless of nationality, race or religion, and preserve the jobs for our qualified citizens.


Excerpt: While conservatives have been formulating carefully constructed arguments, liberals have been playing a long-term game to change the demographics of America to get an electorate more to their liking.

They will do incalculable damage to the nation and to individual citizens, but Democrats will have an unbeatable majority. Just like California, the United States is on its way to becoming a Third World, one-party state.

Teddy Kennedy's 1965 Immigration Act was expressly designed to change the ethnic composition of America to make it more like Nigeria, considered more susceptible to liberal demagogues.

Since 1965, instead of taking immigrants that replicate the country's existing ethnic mix, we've been admitting mostly immigrants from the Third World. At the same time, people from the countries that sent immigrants to this country for its first several centuries have been barred.

Eighty-five percent of immigrants now come from "developing countries." (How are they ever going to develop if their people are all on the dole over here?)

The "browning of America" is not a natural process. It's been artificially imposed by Democrats who are confident of their abilities to turn Third World immigrants into government patrons.

It's worked. According to the Center for Immigration Studies, 57 percent of all immigrant households in the U.S. get cash, Medicaid, housing or food benefits from the government -- compared with 39 percent of native households. The highest rates are for immigrants from the Dominican Republic (82 percent), Mexico and Guatemala (tied at 75 percent).

Isn't the idea to get immigrants with special skills? If you can't even get a job, by definition, you do not have a special skill. Other than voting Democrat.

Read full Ann Coulter article here.

Media Underplays Successful Defensive Gun Use

Our media has been so infiltrated by left leaning libtards that the American people can no longer rely on unbiased reporting. This article lists but a few of the attempts by so-called journalists to slant the news in favor of gun control, an assault on our second amendment rights. 


Excerpt: On February 28, 2012, an angry 28-year-old gunman entered a medical office building in Colorado Springs and took three women hostage. After a three-hour standoff, the police shot him, and he died later that evening at a local hospital. The hostages were unharmed. 


Yet the two largest newspapers in the state took two very different approaches in reporting the heroic actions of one of the clinic physicians, Dr. Jeff Ferguson, a legally armed civilian. 


The Colorado Springs Gazette noted:


Ferguson said he has a concealed weapons permit and he grabbed his gun, which was stored nearby. He stood between the gunman and others as an estimated 20 employees and 30 patients in his offices went down the stairs. Some of the patients were in surgical gowns or partially undressed as they left the building, he said. 


The local CBS affiliate KKTV reported similarly: “Doctor With Gun Saves Others From Hostage Situation”:


In the chaos, employees started shouting about another exit way, one Dr. Ferguson didn’t want the gunman to know about. He guarded the exit with his gun, allowing everyone else to escape and ready to shoot if he had to. … Dr. Ferguson got out and gave SWAT valuable information about the layout and the man inside. 


The Denver Post? They did not mention an armed civilian:


Employees and clients at other offices in the medical building were able to escape with the help of SWAT officers. 


Most people would regard the Denver Post version as inaccurate and misleading. But this kind of misleading reporting is not an isolated occurrence. 


On January 16, 2002, Peter Odighizuwa came onto the campus of Appalachian Law School and shot dead the school dean, a professor, and a student, and wounded three other students. Two other students,


Mikael Gross and Tracy Bridges, retrieved their handguns from their vehicles, forced Odighizuwa to drop his weapon, and with the help of another student, subdued him. Odighizuwa is now in jail for the murders he committed.


Regarding coverage of the incident, gun rights scholar John Lott noted: 


Out of 218 unique news stories (from a LexisNexis search) in the week after the event, just four mentioned that the students who stopped the shooter had guns.


Instead, this description from the Washington Post was typical: Three students pounced on the gunman and held him until help arrived. 


Other papers similarly reported that “students tackled the gunman” or “students ended the rampage by confronting and then tackling the gunman, who dropped his weapon.”


One of the heroic students, Tracy Bridges, “carefully described to over 50 reporters what had happened, explaining how he had to point his gun at the attacker and yell at him to drop his gun.” Yet the vast majority of stories omitted the fact that Gross and Bridges used their guns to stop the killer. 


What accounts for this omission? According to Lott, some of the reporters cited “space constraints.” Others claimed they didn’t know that Bridges and Gross were armed. Associated Press media relations manager Jack Stokes denied any anti-gun reporting bias. However, he did admit that when he learned how Gross and Bridges stopped Odighizuwa, he was “shocked,” and thought to himself:


My God, they’re putting into jeopardy even more people by bringing out these guns.

Read full PJ Media report here.

Immigration American Style

We built this Mr. President

Rep. Allen West comments on Atlas Shrugged

Unintended consequences - CFL bulbs cause skin damage

Another example of our government not knowing what they are doing other than exerting control over the citizenry. They have forced the manufacture of light bulbs offshore to China, doing away with thousands of jobs here in the U.S., and, in doing so, have created a health hazard. Another example of why we should trust them with our health system. lol 


Excerpt: Based on the research, scientists concluded that CFL light bulbs can be harmful to healthy skin cells. 


“Our study revealed that the response of healthy skin cells to UV emitted from CFL bulbs is consistent with damage from ultraviolet radiation,” said lead researcher Miriam Rafailovich, Professor of Materials Science and Engineering at Stony Brook University, in New York, in a statement. “Skin cell damage was further enhanced when low dosages of TiO2 nanoparticles were introduced to the skin cells prior to exposure.” 


According to Rafailovich, with or without TiO2 (a chemical found in sunblock), incandescent bulbs of the same light intensity had zero effects on healthy skin. 


The scientists found that cracks in the CFL bulbs phosphor coatings yielded significant levels of UVC and UVA in all of the bulbs — purchased in different locations across two counties — they examined. 


With high levels of ultraviolet radiation present, the researchers delved into how the exposure affected the skin. According to the findings, skin damage from exposure to CFLs was consistent with harm caused by ultraviolet radiation. 

Read the full Daily Caller article here.

Trashing Achievements - Obama's war on small business

Obama's goal is to bring down Capitalism and establish a Socialist state. He is a fool intent on destroying our freedom, or what is left of it. Vote him and the Senate Democrats out of office and watch business investment skyrocket. Then hope that the remaining RINOs get the message.


A great article by Thomas Sowell.


 Excerpt: Today, the very concept of achievement is de-emphasized and sometimes attacked. Following in the footsteps of Barack Obama, Professor Elizabeth Warren of Harvard has made the downgrading of high achievers the centerpiece of her election campaign against Senator Scott Brown.


To cheering audiences, Professor Warren says, "there is nobody in this country who got rich on his own. Nobody. You build a factory out there, good for you, but I want to be clear. You moved your goods to market on the roads the rest of us paid for. You hired workers that the rest of us paid to educate."


Do the people who cheer this kind of talk bother to stop and think through what she is saying? Or is heady rhetoric enough for them?


People who run businesses are benefitting from things paid for by others? Since when are people in business, or high-income earners in general, exempt from paying taxes like everybody else?


At a time when a small fraction of high-income taxpayers pay the vast majority of all the taxes collected, it is sheer chutzpah to depict high-income earners as somehow being subsidized by "the rest of us," whether in paying for the building of roads or the educating of the young.


Since everybody else uses the roads and the schools, why should high achievers be expected to feel like free loaders who owe still more to the government, because schools and roads are among the things that facilitate their work? According to Elizabeth Warren, because it is part of an "underlying social contract."


People who succeed -- whether in business or anywhere else -- are often said to be "privileged," even if they started out poor and worked their way up the hard way.


Outcome differences are called "class" differences. Thus when two white women, who came from families in very similar social and economic circumstances, made different decisions and got different results, this was the basis for a front-page story titled "Two Classes, Divided by 'I Do'" in the July 15th issue of the N.Y Times. Personal responsibility, whether for achievement or failure, is a threat to the whole vision of the left, and a threat the left goes all-out to combat, using rhetoric uninhibited by reality.

Read full Thomas Sowell article here.

Romney's Successes vs. Obama's Failures

Obama's October surprise - ATTACK on IRAN

It looks like Obama's campaign financing is a little slow among his normal Jewish donors.  Nothing like a good ole war supporting the Jewish state to bring them back in line.  It is a shame that something so critical to the security of the world should boil down to politics.  We can only hope that he doesn't go in half heartily and let it blow up in his face and put our servicemen in extreme harms way.  His stupidity by waiting so long and relying on ineffective sanctions has allowed Iran to strengthen its armed forces and brought us to the brink, conveniently very close to an election in which he is behind. 


Excerpt: Looks like Obama has a HUGE October Surprise up his sleeve... an ATTACK ON IRAN - possibly in October.  


http://debka.com is reporting that high-level Saudi sources are telling visiting officials that Obama has decided that if nothing changes between now and October the U.S. will attack Iran's nuclear facilities.  


One thing we know for sure is that Obama will do anything to improve his re-election chances, and nothing works better than starting a war right before an election to get Americans on your side.  And by doing it in October, right before the election, Obama will avoid any negative blowback if things turn chaotic in the attack's aftermath.


Obama is also using this to increase support and fund raising among Jewish Americans.  He has invited many Jewish leaders to the White House and left them with the distinct impression that he was going to attack Iran. 

The impression of an operation’s imminence was also gained by American Jewish leaders during recent visits to the White House. In the last DEBKA-Net-Weekly issue (No. 546 from June 22), we reported that President Obama has been inviting Jewish leaders to visit him in the Oval Office in an effort to stanch the loss of Jewish support and Jewish contributions draining away from his election campaign.


Like the Saudi princes, the Jewish leaders came away with a strong sense that the president had made up his mind to attack Iran.

Read full article here.

Obama - If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck

With Egypt going deeper into the Sharia world, I thought I would re-post my Obama duck article. 


Many questions have been raised about President Obama’s religious beliefs and have been vetted in many ways which have only led to confusion. Whether or not his father was a practicing Muslim and did he have any influence on such a young boy? Did his Muslim stepfather, his upbringing and four years of schooling in the Muslim country of Indonesia give him an affinity toward Islam in his later life? Did he join Reverend Wright’s United Church of Christ some 20+ years ago because he is truly a Christian, or because it would open up new avenues for political advancement? 


Barrack Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, was an avowed atheist who introduced him to many religions so that he could choose for himself. Did he choose to be a Christian, Buddhist, Atheist or Muslim? Was it just a slip of the tongue when, on This Week with George Stephanopoulos, he referred to “my Muslim faith”? 


What have we seen since he became President? 


He bowed to the Saudi King. Many believe that this was not fitting for the President of The United States of America, but it was required of those of the Muslim faith. Did he bow out of deference or because of his religious beliefs? 


He supported the proposed building of the Ground Zero Mosque, quoting the law while showing insensitively to the pleas of the survivors and relatives of those who died.


Van Jones, who resigned as Obama’s “Green Energy Czar”, has been active in the “Occupy” movement that is trying to emulate the “Arab Spring” uprisings in the Arab world. President Obama has supported the “Arab Spring” uprisings, that replaced an Egyptian government friendly with Israel, with one controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood that is moving the country toward Islamic Sharia law. 


In 2010, the Muslim Brotherhood issued a jihad against the United States. A few weeks ago, Obama and the State Department released $1.5 billion in foreign aid to Egypt, a government that is now dominated by that same Muslim Brotherhood. 


Our concern is that President Obama is either extremely naïve, or he really is a duck. 

Read original article at Examiner.com here.