Wednesday, October 31, 2012
Mother Teresa’s words of wisdom
“If you are kind, people may accuse you of selfish, ulterior motives; be kind anyway.
If you are successful, you will win some false friends and true enemies; succeed anyway.
If you are honest and frank, people may cheat you; be honest and frank anyway.
If you find serenity and happiness, they may be jealous; be happy anyway.
The good you do today, people will often forget tomorrow; do good anyway…
You see, in the final analysis, it is between you and God; it was never between you and them anyway.” ― Mother Teresa
If you are successful, you will win some false friends and true enemies; succeed anyway.
If you are honest and frank, people may cheat you; be honest and frank anyway.
If you find serenity and happiness, they may be jealous; be happy anyway.
The good you do today, people will often forget tomorrow; do good anyway…
You see, in the final analysis, it is between you and God; it was never between you and them anyway.” ― Mother Teresa
Labels:
Character,
Ethics,
Faith,
Motivation,
Religion
Benghazi: Obama let four Americans die
Wrote an article for Examiner.com.
Excerpt: The blood of Ambassador Stevens, civilian Sean Smith and two brave Navy Seals, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, is on the hands of someone in the administration, and all the signs point to President Obama and his order to “Stand Down”.
Read my article here.
Labels:
2012,
Elections,
Foreign Policy,
Obama,
Terrorism
Tuesday, October 30, 2012
Monday, October 29, 2012
Are Democrats a Fundamental Threat to American Democracy and Enemies of the American People
I've been watching Caddell interviews for awhile and find him to be a bright light among the Democrats. He is intelligent and sees the destruction that Obama is doing to our freedom and our beloved country.
Excerpt: Not all Democrats are treasonous reprobates. But those who aren’t are starting to bail on a party that under Obama has degenerated into an obscenity. For example, Pat Caddell looks about ready to choke on his disgust while discussing Obama’s disgraceful bungling of the terror attack in Benghazi and the “mainstream” media’s equally disgraceful attempts to cover for him. Last night on Jeanine Pirro’s show he provided an apt description of the Obamunists running both the government and the establishment media:
Sunday, October 28, 2012
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
President Bush’s Opening Pitch at Yankee Stadium After 9-11
When was the last time you felt this way about our President ant the “exceptional” USA?
Labels:
2012,
America,
Elections,
George Bush,
Sports
Monday, October 22, 2012
Sunday, October 21, 2012
Election 2012 October surprises?
Read my article “Election 2012 down to the wire” in Examiner.comhere.
Labels:
2012,
Elections,
Foreign Policy,
Iran,
Terrorism
Saturday, October 20, 2012
Friday, October 19, 2012
Thursday, October 18, 2012
Rising food costs, 2008 vs 2012 astronomical, Social Security COLA increase 1.7%
The Obama administration has seen fit to give Social Security recipients a 1.7% raise in benefits in 2013, the lowest since 1975. By not controlling inflation and the cost of energy, Obama is, in effect, decimating the benefits of the retired and elderly. Don’t be fooled by his rhetoric. Read about the COLA “increase”here.
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Monday, October 8, 2012
Obama, Who is he really? Can it all be coincidence?
Read the full article here
Labels:
2012,
Dishonesty and Deception,
Elections,
Obama
Princeton Economist: Obama Campaign Is Misrepresenting My Study on Romney’s Tax Plan
This was posted on The Weekly Standard Blog this morning. I guess Obama didn't do too well in math at school.
Last night, the Obama campaign blasted out another email claiming that Mitt Romney’s tax plan would either require raising taxes on the middle class or blowing a hole in the deficit. “Even the studies that Romney has cited to claim his plan adds up still show he would need to raise middle-class taxes,” said the Obama campaign press release. “In fact, Harvard economist Martin Feldstein and Princeton economist Harvey Rosen both concede that paying for Romney’s tax cuts would require large tax increases on families making between $100,000 and $200,000.”
But that’s not true. Princeton professor Harvey Rosen tells THE WEEKLY STANDARD in an email that the Obama campaign is misrepresenting his paper on Romney’s tax plan:
I can’t tell exactly how the Obama campaign reached that characterization of my work. It might be that they assume that Governor Romney wants to keep the taxes from the Affordable Care Act in place, despite the fact that the Governor has called for its complete repeal. The main conclusion of my study is that under plausible assumptions, a proposal along the lines suggested by Governor Romney can both be revenue neutral and keep the net tax burden on taxpayers with incomes above $200,000 about the same. That is, an increase in the tax burden on lower and middle income individuals is not required in order to make the overall plan revenue neutral.
You can check the math that shows Romney’s plan is mathematically possible here.
Labels:
2012,
Dishonesty and Deception,
Elections,
Mitt Romney,
Obama
Thursday, October 4, 2012
Obama's Re-Election Case Rests On 5 Phony Claims
Investors Business Daily has a great take-down on Obama's blame game. I have copied the details on the one that irritates me the most. For the rest of the article go to the original post.
Excerpt: That argument appears to be working. More people continue to blame Bush than Obama for the current poor state of affairs, and some surveys show that consumer confidence has recently increased.
But each part of Obama's argument is based on claims that are not accurate:
• Bush tax cuts and deregulation caused the recession.
At a campaign rally, Obama said Romney is "just churning out the same ideas that we saw in the decade before I took office . . . the same tax cuts and deregulation agenda that helped get us into this mess in the first place."
It's a standard Obama talking point. But it's not true. Bush's tax cuts did not cause the last recession.
In fact, once they were fully in effect in 2003, they sparked stronger growth — generating more than 8 million new jobs over the next four years, and GDP growth averaging close to 3%.
Those tax cuts didn't explode the deficit, either, as Obama frequently claims. Deficits steadily declined after 2003, until the recession hit.
Nor was Bush a deregulator. Conservative Heritage Foundation's regulation expert James Gattuso concluded, after reviewing Bush's record, that "regulation grew substantially during the Bush years."
Even the Washington Post's fact-checker, Glenn Kessler, gave Obama's claim three out of four "Pinocchios," saying "it is time for the Obama campaign to retire this talking point, no matter how much it seems to resonate with voters."
What did cause the economic crisis? The housing bubble. And that, in turn, was the result of a determined federal effort to boost homeownership by, among other things, pressuring banks to lower lending standards.
• I stopped a second Great Depression.
• A slow recovery was inevitable.
• My policies are working.
• Nobody could have done any better.
Read full Investors Business Daily article here.
Labels:
2012,
Dishonesty and Deception,
Elections,
Obama,
Politics
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)